Blog for 2011

Twitter Avatar Image Sizes

When we relaunched our site, we put some extra work in our blog. One of the ideas we added was cribbed from the brilliant folks at Happy Cog... using twitter posts as article comments.

While working on our own implementation, we had to look into Twitter's avatars. After a user uploads an image, what are some of the image sizes the Twitter system produces? Naturally this would affect how our comments looked. Though I searched the Twitter API documentation, I couldn't find any details on the subject (though I admit maybe I just didn't see it).

After some digging and experimentation, I found the following four image avatar files available for most every Twitter profile...

  • There's the full-sized image, the one originally uploaded to Twitter. This can be almost any size and does not necessarily have to be square. All the avatars that twitter creates are based on this image, and those it creates will be square.
  • There is a big version curiously labelled "_reasonably_small" that is cropped to 128x128 pixels. This is the one used in top left of a Twitter profile, by the name, location, and brief bio. The catch is that this image size may not exist if the original image is smaller than 128 pixels... instead this image will return the next size down.
  • There is a medium sized version called "_bigger" that is used in the new twitter layout, specifically in the slide-out pane when you zoom into a conversation. It is 73x73 pixels square.
  • There is a normal sized version called "_normal" that is used as the main avatar in most every twitter list on the official site. It is 48x48 pixels square.
  • Finally, there is a "_mini" sized avatar that is 24x24 pixels square. It is used in the top-right of the new twitter layout, where users access a pulldown of settings and options.

Now, this may not be all of them. And in fact, these might have changed since I originally went poking around. Does anyone have any further information?

E-mail campaigns win out over Social Media

A recent report from ForeSee studying consumer trends has given a report based on 10,000 shoppers surveyed. The shoppers were asked a full range of of questions and opinions regarding why they would make a purchase. The study not only looked at the quantity of visitors driven to a site but the quality of the potential visitor to purchase something.

The study showed that most people will more likely choose you because they are familiar with your brand (38%) followed by e-mail promotion ( 19%). Social Media came in at only 5%.

 

Marketing results

Other highlights from the report include: 

  • Traditional marketing techniques like promotional emails influence not only more traffic; they deliver better-quality traffic. Some of the most satisfied site visitors arrived at the site because of previous familiarity with a brand, promotional emails, word-of-mouth, and product review websites. 
  • Most people want to engage with retailers, but but prefer to do so via email or on retail websites, rather than on social sites.  In fact, only 8% of online shoppers said that’s social media was their preferred way to interact with a retailer. 
  • People are more satisfied with retailers’ presence on Facebook than they are with Facebook itself.

 

How can Visual Lizard help with e-mail marketing and promotion?

Visual Lizard offers a product called E-Mediate Mail which companies can use to target consumers that want to know about ongoing and upcoming promotions by harnessing the power of opt-in emails. 

To help you get the most out of your promotions, we have recently started offering A/B testing. This is a great tool to aid in getting your message out successfully to the people on your list. How it works is that you can have two ads created and when you send out your e-mail blast, a small portion or people on your list will get "e-mail A" and the others will get "e-mail B". Our system will look at who opened and clicked on which e-mail. Once the data is tabulated, we then send the winning e-mail ( the one most clicked ) to the remaining people on your list.

Contact us to discuss how we can set up e-mail promotion for your company.

Daily Links

Daily Links

Bad Email Subscription Forms

In response to the recent CRCT UBB issue, I filled out the OpenMedia petition like many Canadians, in an effort to tell our government representatives that we were unhappy with what was happening to our internet access. Yesterday, I got a response email back from Michael Ignatieff, as did many Winnipeg-ers. It looked like a mass-reply form email. I don't really have a problem that because it would be unrealistic for him to personally send out letters everyone. I would prefer that he put all the email addresses he had in a newsletter system's mailing list and sent out a well-thought-out response efficiently so he can get on with the work of government-ing, rather than waste pointless hours of copy-pasting.

Having said that, I was not interested in being on the Liberal Party of Canada's mailing list. In compliance with the CAN-SPAM laws, the footer supplied a link to unsubscribe to the mailing list.

Liberal Email Footer

Clicking on the provided link took me to the email preferences form on the Liberty Party of Canada website. Unfortunately, this is where what should have been a simple process suddenly became confusing. It looked like this...

Liberal Subscription Form

This is a perfect example on how not to set up an unsubscribe option for your email list. What I don't understand is how anyone can look at that single "to unsubscribe completely" sentence and believe that the form beside it would actually accomplish anything of the sort. If I want to unsubscribe, I need to click a button labelled "subscribe"? That makes no sense. 

I know what I'm supposed to do. I'm supposed to uncheck all the boxes to indicate I do not want to receive any sort of emails and update my preferences. But why don't the instructions on the left actually say that? There's more than enough room there. Why doesn't the button say something like "update my subscription"? That would at least indicate that the form can do both. Or better yet, where is the single link or button that simply says "click here to completely unsubscribe"?

Instead, I get a generic thank you message that doesn't exactly convince me that I've made any sort of change whatsoever. Worse, if I click that email's footer link, I get the same form with the same fields filled and options checked... as if my previous attempt did absolutely nothing. Have I successfully unsubscribed? I have no idea.

This is not a knock against Mr. Ignatieff, the Liberal Party of Canada, or even newsletter campaigns in general. This is me being frustrated at a single, very badly put together web form. Whenever a designer or developer doesn't put enough thought into user interface, or worse puts too much thought into it, we get nonsense like this. It's like so much went into the code, into the layout, into the individual elements that the actual point, a simple "Would you like to unsubscribe?" process, was completely lost.

I started writing this article after receiving Michael Ignatieff's email. I took the above screenshots, posted them to Flickr, and put some initial thoughts down. Also, Mr. Ignatieff's Twitter account started following me shortly after I got that email. Not surprising, as several Winnipeg-ers were discussing the mass-reply and it would have been easy enough to see the resulting hashtags. In fact, it's a smart idea.

Saving my article in draft mode to finish later, I took the opportunity to tweet to Mr. Ignatieff to tell him about my disappointment about the unsubscribe form. I suspect I wasn't the only one to say so, and I suspect Mr. Ignatieff wasn't the only one to hear about it. But when I came back to writing and started playing with the form to reconfirm some facts, I see it's changed a bit...

Liberal Subscription Form, Updated

Well, that's better, though that instructional message could still be worked on a bit. But there's the unsubscribe button that I was expecting to find. Clicking did what I thought it would. Huzzah! Did someone update the form since the afternoon? Hm, no, I don't think so...

Clicking on the original email's footer link again, I got the form as it originally looked. I'm guessing this is what the form looks like to add my profile and preferences to the mailing list? And the other form is what it looks like when I'm already in the system and therefore have to option to be removed? The new "unsubscribe" button's resulting URL does imply that I have been removed.

Though I still believe the form is just too complicated and certainly makes the situation worse, I now think the real culprit here is the overly-generic instructions. If clear copy had been written for adding your profile to the system and then different copy had been written for updating/unsubscribing, it would have gone a long way to clarifying what I was looking at. And saved me a long, ranting blog post :P

TL;DR - Got a form email (aka spam). Clicked unsubscribe. Got confused by a useless form. Hate bad user interfaces, so I wrote about how to make it better. They listened. Hurray internet.

Daily Links

Daily Links

Daily Links

Daily Links

Daily Links

Beware of the Leopard

As you may be vaguely aware, the CRTC has ruled that it's A-OK for Bell to charge overage fees to not only it's users, but also to resellers who make use of Bell's network to connect their customers. They did back off a little bit, and mandated a 15% discount for the little guys. Not for you, of course, but for those DSL resellers. That's possibly just enough to keep the competitions' noses above water, not that it matters to the end users. Canada already had the worst deals for internet and cellular connectivity in the (first) world. Now things are even worse. Yay.

However, since this has been portrayed in the media as a Bell Canada thing, you may not be aware that this affects everyone. They didn't really go to great lengths to make anyone aware of this. I just double-checked with my ISP (Shaw) and, yes, they will be charging for overuse. I was told $2.00 per GB over 100GB for my plan (Extreme), but online the number is $1.00 per GB. Not sure who to trust here (and in any case, according to some the actual cost to Shaw would be less than an penny per GB). According to customer service, in February and March I can expect a notice on how much I went over on my bill, and then in April they'll start charging. This is likely to be as much fun as per-minute phone charges. i.e. Full of inexplicable overages and sudden unexpected increases in your monthly bill. But even better, someone driving by your house can probably use your internet connection to download, well, whatever they want.

In any case, my monthly internet bills are set to double or quadruple, depending on whether or not I need to go up one level or two to match my current level of use. Unfortunately, I don't really know what that is. Apparently this month I used 107GB, but this month I used more than normal. But I'm not sure how much more. I'd be less annoyed with this if I hadn't tried this summer to get Shaw to activate the bandwidth usage logs associated with my account so I could see how much I was actually downloading. At the time I just wanted a rough idea of how much data I used so I would know for certain that I couldn't afford to get all my data by tethering over my phone. Since I already knew the answer to that question, I gave up after calling them every week or two for three months straight. Every time they said it was set up now, and every time they were wrong. If they'd actually set that up for me, I'd already know what to do. (I'm similarly annoyed with Rogers for my phone's data plan. The first two months were unlimited, but they wouldn't show me what I actually used so I'm going into month three blind.)

So, I'm not especially confident that what I was told today by Shaw is true. But I should hopefully have a few months to hack into my neighbours' wifi figure out what my usage actually is. If you, like me, are a Shaw customer, set up an account at my.shaw.ca and check that your bandwidth usage actually starts showing up. They'll be charging you for what you use, so they'd better keep you informed. I was told the website would be relaunched (it was) and that I could find my bandwidth usage there (I haven't been able to find that yet). If you don't use Shaw, find out where to go to get a detailed account of your bandwidth usage. Get to know how much data you actually use, keep a close eye on it, and lock down your wifi.

Update: Just spoke with Shaw technical support again, apparently they don't show your overage until you have gone over 2 months in a row. And, if I understand customer support correctly, they will stop showing this information if you go a month without going over. This is, to me, completely unacceptable. So I'll be harassing Shaw until I get that information.

Update 2: Finally got access to my bandwidth usage from Shaw's website. (Although my.shaw.ca is still down, secure.shaw.ca works somewhat.) For some reason they've hidden this link behind a popup combined with a meta-refresh. So if you block popups (and everyone should, they suck) you can't see your usage. The real link is https://secure.shaw.ca/customer_care/internet_usage/monthlyGB.asp. I'll be having words with them about the inanity of this. And for some reason I can only see usage for part of November, part of December and January. That better improve too. (And, no, we haven't won even if the government reverses the UBB decision. Not unless you were a customer of one of the DSL resellers directly affected. My bill is going up just due to a cash grab timed to look like it was related to this ruling.)

Daily Links